Cognitive Polyphasia, and Why We Contradict Ourselves
Serge Moscovici, a french social psychologist, coined the term Cognitive Polyphasia in the 80s....
Serge Moscovici, a french social psychologist, coined the term Cognitive Polyphasia in the 80s. Same guy behind the social representation theory (another interesting read).
This seemingly innocent frame of mind, is all about having contradicting thoughts and multiple frame of references to explain an event either to themselves or to other people. In other words, or in the words of Orwell, its “double-think“.
E.g., you go to the gym everyday for a week, justifying it to yourself as you’re a motivated individual with goals. You don’t go for a month after, and you build up your castle of excuses to justify it to yourself. “I don’t have the time“, or “I won’t build muscle easily” or a host of other frame of minds.
Here’s a direct quote from Serge’s publications:
Through belief, the individual or group is not related as a subject to an object, an observer to a landscape; he is connected with his world as an actor to the character he embodies, man to his home, a person to his or her identity
(Moscovici, 2000, p. 253)
If you continue down the rabbit hole of cognitive polyphasia, you end up inevitably thinking about neuroscience. Our brains are wired to make new connections constantly about ourselves and our environment. Synapse constantly fire off into new directions, and neurons continue to transfer information. Like a giant computer. And this giant computer, with all its storage and computational power, runs multiple simulations in itself to define a certain event. Declarative semantic memory too is affected by our own interpretation of an event. And thus, what we see outside is directly associated with what we feel inside. That girl didn’t reject you because you behaved inappropriately, she rejected you because she wasn’t into manly-men.
Ok, consider the Pre-Frontal Cortex. Our PFC is designed for executive level decision making and has a strong role to play in our memory. I.e. if you had a bad experience with a certain place, space, or time, then you’ll categorize all the things connected to that event as things “to avoid”. Fight or flight, in other words.
These three facts, in conjunction, lead me to believe that the reason why we have conflicting thoughts about ourselves, our environment, our mood, our decisions, and our mind, are because of multiple theories running simultaneously in our mind. And by theories I mean justifications, or coming as close to a perceived truth as possible. The inner noise in our heads, could just be our mind going into overdrive with multiple off-shoots of theories, justifications, and interpretations. Like a person who’s depressed for a few days, and snaps out of it almost instantly. He gets a hug from a friend, and suddenly the worlds a better place.
We’re constantly trying to crack the code, and in our efforts we’re trying to hack into everyday emotions like happiness, anger, depressions, and hopelessness. We’re trying to find a way out, and so we build up our castles based on assumptions of the truth, only to have them break down when another snippet of truth is presented to us.
E.g., you think that the world should have more happy people, and you choose to smile to strangers every day or so. You consider yourself to be a happy person that wants to share her inner happiness with the world. Until, a stranger judges her for smiling at him, and she feels immensely hurt. Now her mind’s racing into overdrive in the other direction. She adds this event, as proof, to her memory – as a reason why the world is full of bad people. The next day, she tries again and fails. She gives up on the idea, coming to the conclusion that the world can’t be changed. Until, a week later, a little girl thanks her for reaching over the top shelf in a grocery store. Her world has changed again. She now adds this event as a brick to her castle of “the world is a happy place”. She’s happier and she’ll continue on until she faces another event that will add a brick or two in the favor of “the world is inherently bad”.
We climb, we overcome, and we fail and feel depressed. Our mood swings start to define us, and we don’t even know who we are anymore. Our minds constantly fire off with multiple reasons, multiple theories, and multiple justifications that run simultaneously until we find the single unifying truth.
If your mind can control your breathing, your stomach acids, your hormone levels, your neurological functioning, effortlessly, how is it that this complex machine can’t handle the simple things like motivation, depression, mood-swings, and sadness? Why do we constantly have conflicting thoughts in our minds?
Why do I feel happy at one instant, and sad during others? Why can’t I just be above emotions and crack the code on living a happier life?
The latter is what we’re trying to achieve through Polyphasia. We’re trying to find a consistent rationality for the world that we see by building up or by rejection hypotheses about what we see. And we take this too seriously. We stick too quickly to a certain idealogy, and when we fail we feel horrible.
See? It’s not the event that made you feel bad. It’s the fact that the event didn’t fit in with your current view of the world. “Why do bad things happen to good people?”, “How could my boss scream at me?”, or “How could he dump me?”
When in reality, its more like
- “Why do bad things happen to good people. I’ve always been going to church.”
- “How could my boss scream at me, I’ve always given him so much respect.”
- “How could he dump me, I thought that we were going to be happy forever.”
And so our brains build up these suppositions, that fall. And when they fall, we fall.
And hence, there is no need to be taken away with our emotions, as our thoughts and how we feel inside are simply a matter of our minds considering multiple variations of processing the world. You feel depressed for a few days, thinking that you’ll realise something extraordinary in that sadness and add a brick to the “the world is a good place” castle.
And then you’ll come out with a new rationality about how the world is. And also how it should be.
So relax, there’s immense freedom in not sticking to ideas or thoughts that aren’t true representations of real life.